If you include groups, your chance of encountering a female grows to 13%.
However, this means that if you do encounter a female, there is about a 1 in 3 chance that she will be part of a group.
We were itching to study Chatroulette in a RJMetrics Dashboard, but no one seemed to have any good data for us to explore.
As you might expect, most people were young adults (about 70%). Female-only groups were “Teen or Younger” 65% of the time, while groups of males were “Teens or Younger” only 36% of the time.About 20% were under 20 and about 10% were 40 and older. There were no groups whatsoever of people 40 or older.If you do not meet these requirements, then you do not have permission to use the Website. Moore, the CEO and co-founder of RJMetrics, an on-demand database analytics and business intelligence startup.His last guest post was an analysis of Twitter user data.
It’s no surprise that Chatroulette is the latest media darling.It’s a little-known fact that anyone you chat with on Chatroulette can determine your IP address using a program like Wireshark.Chatroulette Map uses this IP data to geolocate and map random chatters on their website (along with still photos from their chats).Also interesting is the prevalence of groups on Chatroulette.In all, 8% of chats featured a group of people (4% all-male, 2% all-female, and 2% mixed).In under two hours, we received 10,770 photo assessments from 1,012 distinct IP addresses. Before we get to the data, we should point out the uncontrolled inputs that could be skewing these results: As you might expect, you’re most likely to encounter a solo male in any given chat session. Interestingly, 11% showed no person at all while only 9% showed a solo female.