Creationist researchers have suggested that dates of 35,000 - 45,000 years should be re-calibrated to the biblical date of the flood. Such a re-calibration makes sense of anomalous data from carbon dating—for example, very discordant “dates” for different parts of a frozen musk ox carcass from Alaska and an inordinately slow rate of accumulation of ground sloth dung pellets in the older layers of a cave where the layers were carbon dated. Also, volcanoes emit much COC.
The rate of decay of N in 5,730 years (plus or minus 40 years).
This is the “half-life.” So, in two half-lives, or 11,460 years, only one-quarter of that in living organisms at present, then it has a theoretical age of 11,460 years.
There are various other radiometric dating methods used today to give ages of millions or billions of years for rocks.
These techniques, unlike carbon dating, mostly use the relative concentrations of parent and daughter products in radioactive decay chains.
Obviously, this works only for things which were once living.
It cannot be used to date volcanic rocks, for example.Accordingly, carbon dating carefully applied to items from historical times can be useful.However, even with such historical calibration, archaeologists do not regard C produced and therefore dating the system.In summary, the carbon-14 method, when corrected for the effects of the flood, can give useful results, but needs to be applied carefully.It does not give dates of millions of years and when corrected properly fits well with the biblical flood.Looking for a married guy that wants more of a sex life.